wickedsp1d3r wrote:

MasterC wrote:

wickedsp1d3r wrote:Thanks for the heads up, I tweaked CSS a bit. I didn't notice this on my own screen, which browser you're using?

Safari Version 4.0.3 (6531.9), and it's still like the screenshot.

Darn...my Safari (same version) displays it without the gap and so do other browsers on bigger resolutions. I'm out of ideas :-!

Looking through your code, your footer div is outside of your page_wrap div. That might explain why it's behaving this way.

MasterC wrote:

wickedsp1d3r wrote:

MasterC wrote:Safari Version 4.0.3 (6531.9), and it's still like the screenshot.

Darn...my Safari (same version) displays it without the gap and so do other browsers on bigger resolutions. I'm out of ideas :-!

Looking through your code, your footer div is outside of your page_wrap div. That might explain why it's behaving this way.

Does it really matter? Both closing tags will just be </div>, and you wouldn’t know if they were switched or not. Even if they were, there would be no difference. Also, the white box does extend down.

Here is my new professional website : LINK

Your site looks good Tek! On your downloads page though, only the right side of the "Download" graphic has an "over" state but after I click it, the whole graphic has it.

I'm using Opera so maybe it's just my browser noticing this.

DreadedKilla wrote:

MasterC wrote:

wickedsp1d3r wrote:Darn...my Safari (same version) displays it without the gap and so do other browsers on bigger resolutions. I'm out of ideas :-!

Looking through your code, your footer div is outside of your page_wrap div. That might explain why it's behaving this way.

Does it really matter? Both closing tags will just be </div>, and you wouldn’t know if they were switched or not. Even if they were, there would be no difference. Also, the white box does extend down.

Yes, it does matter. If the footer div is outside of the content flow, it won't line up. And no, the white does not extend down. There's still a gap.

Larkef wrote:Since my thread got locked (no worries ) I would like to post my brand new site again.

I am located right here: www.larkef.com
And here, www.twitter.com/Larkef

I did the design, my bro did the HTML & CSS & JS, you can follow him at www.twitter.com/jonnotie .

Love the website design. Minimalistic.

MasterC wrote:

DreadedKilla wrote:

MasterC wrote:Looking through your code, your footer div is outside of your page_wrap div. That might explain why it's behaving this way.

Does it really matter? Both closing tags will just be </div>, and you wouldn’t know if they were switched or not. Even if they were, there would be no difference. Also, the white box does extend down.

Yes, it does matter. If the footer div is outside of the content flow, it won't line up. And no, the white does not extend down. There's still a gap.

Moved the div inside the wrap div. Is it working now?

wickedsp1d3r wrote:

MasterC wrote:

DreadedKilla wrote:Does it really matter? Both closing tags will just be </div>, and you wouldn’t know if they were switched or not. Even if they were, there would be no difference. Also, the white box does extend down.

Yes, it does matter. If the footer div is outside of the content flow, it won't line up. And no, the white does not extend down. There's still a gap.

Moved the div inside the wrap div. Is it working now?

Yes, it works now. :thumbsup:



DreadedKilla, what was that about it not mattering?

MasterC wrote:

wickedsp1d3r wrote:

MasterC wrote:Yes, it does matter. If the footer div is outside of the content flow, it won't line up. And no, the white does not extend down. There's still a gap.

Moved the div inside the wrap div. Is it working now?

Yes, it works now. :thumbsup:

http://chrisvick.com/macthemes/coldnessinmylifeworksnow.png

DreadedKilla, what was that about it not mattering?

That's awesome good to know that it's working now :thumbsup:

MasterC wrote:

wickedsp1d3r wrote:

MasterC wrote:Yes, it does matter. If the footer div is outside of the content flow, it won't line up. And no, the white does not extend down. There's still a gap.

Moved the div inside the wrap div. Is it working now?

Yes, it works now. :thumbsup:

http://chrisvick.com/macthemes/coldnessinmylifeworksnow.png

DreadedKilla, what was that about it not mattering?

I had no problem viewing it anyway. It looked like the screenshot at the time I posted my comment.

And why would the divs matter?

Code: Select all

<div id="page-content">
   blah blah blah
   
   <div id="footer">
      blah blah blah
   </div>   

   
</div>

The closing div tags would mean the same if you exchanged them.

Nokadota wrote:Your site looks good Tek! On your downloads page though, only the right side of the "Download" graphic has an "over" state but after I click it, the whole graphic has it.

I'm using Opera so maybe it's just my browser noticing this.

Thank you for this bug report. :thumbsup:

Tekikou wrote:

Nokadota wrote:Your site looks good Tek! On your downloads page though, only the right side of the "Download" graphic has an "over" state but after I click it, the whole graphic has it.

I'm using Opera so maybe it's just my browser noticing this.

Thank you for this bug report. :thumbsup:

No problem. I think I am going to like this particular thread a lot and I hope other MT members do too. This is just very helpful and convenient.

Nokadota wrote:No problem. I think I am going to like this particular thread a lot and I hope other MT members do too. This is just very helpful and convenient.

Me too, it was a really good idea.

Anyway I just started a webpage for a new app I'm working on called Snapload.It's not finished yet but what do you think so far?

Oh and before you internet-punch me the icon is just temporary! I needed some kind of icon for the webpage (testing purposes) so I just took Jonatan Castro's awesome camera icon and put a green arrow on it. It will be changed once I find someone to create an icon for me. Anyhoo here's the site. It uses a safari webkit effect on the nav but should still display ok in Firefox, just without the nice fade in effect.

http://collinhenderson.com/snapload

I just had a question for you guys. I'm also working on my web, but whenever i have roll over images i cant seem to make it work with either highslide or lightbox css. It's either the image loading or rollover menus, any suggestions?

Thank You

Hendo wrote:

Nokadota wrote:No problem. I think I am going to like this particular thread a lot and I hope other MT members do too. This is just very helpful and convenient.

Me too, it was a really good idea.

Anyway I just started a webpage for a new app I'm working on called Snapload.It's not finished yet but what do you think so far?

Oh and before you internet-punch me the icon is just temporary! I needed some kind of icon for the webpage (testing purposes) so I just took Jonatan Castro's awesome camera icon and put a green arrow on it. It will be changed once I find someone to create an icon for me. Anyhoo here's the site. It uses a safari webkit effect on the nav but should still display ok in Firefox, just without the nice fade in effect.

http://collinhenderson.com/snapload

Mixing serif and sans-serif generally doesn't work b/c it looks awkward. Are you going to have a stylized title?

marty5marty wrote:I just had a question for you guys. I'm also working on my web, but whenever i have roll over images i cant seem to make it work with either highslide or lightbox css. It's either the image loading or rollover menus, any suggestions?

Thank You

Give us a link so we can get a better understanding of what you're talking about!

DreadedKilla wrote:

MasterC wrote:

wickedsp1d3r wrote:Moved the div inside the wrap div. Is it working now?

Yes, it works now. :thumbsup:

http://chrisvick.com/macthemes/coldnessinmylifeworksnow.png

DreadedKilla, what was that about it not mattering?

I had no problem viewing it anyway. It looked like the screenshot at the time I posted my comment.

And why would the divs matter?

Code: Select all

<div id="page-content">
   blah blah blah
   
   <div id="footer">
      blah blah blah
   </div>   

   
</div>

The closing div tags would mean the same if you exchanged them.

Your screen resolution is probably smaller than mine, so that's why it worked for you. And once again, the way the divs were closed do matter in his case because of the way he had his divs set up.

Nokadota wrote:Mixing serif and sans-serif generally doesn't work b/c it looks awkward. Are you going to have a stylized title?

I don't see any serif fonts? Are you using FF? Everything is supposed to be Helvetica Neue...

Hendo wrote:

Nokadota wrote:Mixing serif and sans-serif generally doesn't work b/c it looks awkward. Are you going to have a stylized title?

I don't see any serif fonts? Are you using FF? Everything is supposed to be Helvetica Neue...

Me neither, on Safari 4.
Also, do you have permission to use that icon?

Ryqiem wrote:

Hendo wrote:

Nokadota wrote:Mixing serif and sans-serif generally doesn't work b/c it looks awkward. Are you going to have a stylized title?

I don't see any serif fonts? Are you using FF? Everything is supposed to be Helvetica Neue...

Me neither, on Safari 4.
Also, do you have permission to use that icon?

It's just a temp and the website isn't really public as the app isn't even close to beta yet.

Ahaha, never mind guys.

Nokadota wrote:I think I like the badge icon the most on your site luckey, and the posts look like Polaroids. Should I put mine up?

http://dsgn.pw-software.com is my portfolio. I had some javascript issues at first due to one of the files not being bug-tested enough.

Having one thread is certainly helpful and an excellent idea. Someone who may be having a creative block can come here first, and maybe have some questions answered.

Hey mate! love ur layout and all! just wondering if the top part slide show thing is made out of flash? or some sort of code? anyways! keep up the good work and hope to see more out of it! :thumbsup:

marty5marty wrote:

Nokadota wrote:I think I like the badge icon the most on your site luckey, and the posts look like Polaroids. Should I put mine up?

http://dsgn.pw-software.com is my portfolio. I had some javascript issues at first due to one of the files not being bug-tested enough.

Having one thread is certainly helpful and an excellent idea. Someone who may be having a creative block can come here first, and maybe have some questions answered.

Hey mate! love ur layout and all! just wondering if the top part slide show thing is made out of flash? or some sort of code? anyways! keep up the good work and hope to see more out of it! :thumbsup:

Ahaha, thanks man! The whole concept of the landing page was loosely based upon my old cellphone. The top part you're talking about uses JavaScript.

Everyone, feel free to have a peek at my sourcecode to find out something new. :thumbsup:

wow i just tried doing the spacegallery jquery plugin....so hard! :/ i can't find any tutorials for it! hahaha

marty5marty wrote:wow i just tried doing the spacegallery jquery plugin....so hard! :/ i can't find any tutorials for it! hahaha

The SpaceGallery plugin is actually very poorly managed. I figured out how to do some things myself. There's also an error in one of the files, which required me to go into everyone, decrypt and analyze it to take out the unnecessary code. Ugh, it was a nightmare.

If you want the sorta-optimized version, just download it from my server. Also, for some reason, the image you want first has to be called last.

you are right...it is poorly managed! :/ oh well, thanks for everything...tried it but still failed at it...haha :-!

btw, am i supposed to do anything to the JS files? i mean go in to lets say spacegallery.js or css and do something inside also???

if so...i think im gonna have to give up...LOL